One of the candidates vying for a position on the Minnesota Supreme Court may be defying laws that prohibit churches from intervening in political campaigns. Tim Tingelstad, an extremely conservative court candidate who appears to have connections with groups who deny all existence of the separation of church and state is planning to have a “Pie Social Fundraiser” at which the money raised will go to the Tingelstad campaign.
From the Tingelstad Facebook Page:
While there are times when candidates may appear in church without the church violating its tax exempt status it is pretty clear that fundraising for a particular candidate violates the law:
Speaking as a Candidate
When a candidate is invited to speak at an organization event as a political candidate, the organization must take steps to ensure that:• It provides an equal opportunity to political candidates seeking the same office;
• It does not indicate any support for or opposition to the candidate (this should be stated explicitly when the candidate is introduced and in communications concerning the candidate’s attendance); and
• No political fundraising occurs. [emphasis mine]
I sent emails to the church in question and Tim Tingelstad requesting comment about whether they are knowingly violating the law and jeopardizing the tax exempt status of this church. There will be continued updates as more information becomes available.
This post has been UPDATED…









This is pretty blatant and I am surprised. Support of political candidates happens (unfortunately) often from the pulpit of churches(including having candidates speak from the pulpit)–especially conservative ones–but I have never seen one have the balls or ignorance of law to actually fundraise. During the Obama election, one pastor was charged for supporting BHO for press from the pulpit, but usually this stuff stays under the radar. Good clergy know that politics do not belong in the church.
I couldn't agree more bluecollardaughter. Regardless of party, churches ought to be used as places of worship and not tools in a partisan battle.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Blue MoJo Wire! and bluecollardaughter, Eric Austin. Eric Austin said: Outstate Politics: MN Republican Endorsed Candidate Holding Political Fundraiser At Bemidji Church http://bit.ly/aGd82u #mn2010 #stribpol [...]
I'm not sure about the exact circumstance here, but use of a facility doesn't necessarily mean the event is a church event. If this is a church event, then it is a problem.
No, it doesn't mean the event is a church event. However, I think it may pose a problem regardless given that it is a fundraiser at the church facility. At least that is how I read the IRS rules on this.
I have been wrong before, however, and would welcome an expert to speak to the issue. Also, I would love for the church itself or Tingelstad to return my email.